So I'm seeing a lot of stuff about the JonBenet Ramsey case, because it's the 20 year anniversary. I have some opinions, yay for armchair detectives!
I'm 99% certain they will never actually find the killer, because the whole case was so severely mishandled/botched by the police.
That entire police force came off as incompetent, had no idea how to handle a murder case, and quite possibly a missing person case (but, and I'm not a police officer so I don't know, but I'm pretty sure you aren't supposed to just let people wander the crime scene, nor let the family/friends help search the house for the missing person. Seems like common sense).
It makes 0 sense that the ransom note was written on pen and paper found inside the home. I...I can't even go there. It raises a red flag for me that will never entirely exclude the family from at least knowing something happened.
Oh, they found DNA evidence, you say? I bet I could find some too, after about a billion people handled the poor girl's body.
Personally, I feel like the parents/family have to have some knowledge of what happened to that poor little girl. I understand that the DNA evidence excluded them, BUT I'm not entirely sure I trust it, considering the botched circumstances. From the way the parents acted the whole time, the father going 'right to' the body AFTER the house had been searched, what twice? The ransom note specifying the exact amount of bonus the father got? That part gets me the most. That says it HAS to be someone 'on the inside'. It's too far-fetched that someone could randomly pull that number out of thin air.
Why, if the mother had gone to bed, was she still in the party dress? I mean, I guess she could have slept naked, rolled out of bed and grabbed the first thing she could find to put on, but I find that kind of a stretch. Maybe the parents were up later and fell asleep in the party clothes. Was the father still in his though? No one has ever mentioned.
What about the police officer who supposedly overheard the father finalizing airline tickets. Who the heck does something like that when your fucking child is missing?! That blows my mind. I guess I wouldn't know for sure how I'd act but I'm pretty sure I wouldn't be sitting around playing video games or something if my kid was missing. I'm pretty sure I'd be panicked and possibly inconsolable, I might go on a cleaning spree but I'd be sobbing and/or completely erratic, not getting much done. I don't feel, if my child was missing, that is be able to stay calm. Much less so if she were dead.
As for rumors that the child showed signs of 'ongoing sexual assault'? I buy it. Really. I'm heard theories about elite pedophile rings the family was involved in, etc, but I think it's likely that they 'pimped her out', so to speak.
I have always felt there was something fishy going on here, but I don't feel the death was an intention murder. I feel like it was probably an accident by a man who was given access to this poor girl for sexual reasons.
The grand jury felt compelled enough by whatever evidence presented them that they were going to indict the parents on several counts, including involvement in the death of a minor under 16 (I think that's the correct wording). Again, I have always felt the parents were involved in some way with their daughter's death, be it covering up for one of her brothers, their son, or covering for each other, or for someone they knew.
Say what you want, point to whatever evidence you want, but it's crystal clear that the case was so mishandled, so botched, and the officers involved so incompetent, that this case will never be solved, short of someone outright admitting to their guilt.